The fourth reason is Labour’s invisibility. That is not Labour’s fault. It has an innovative website which is scoring well. It pours out press statements, many of which make a real point. It joins protests and organises meetings. Labour is not silent.Who but a political journalist would think that voters might rate a political party on the basis of how many press releases it produces or how “innovative” its website is? Who but a political journalist would even look at a political party’s website?
All of us outside the beltway detest the expression “inside the beltway”, but that paragraph is so inside the beltway.
2 comments:
For a lovely moment I thought it was "Stillness from Colin James."
What a beautiful thought.
Post a Comment