“essentially a literary gossip column” – CK Stead, 18 April 2010
Wednesday, February 1, 2012
Happy birthday, Oxford English Dictionary
The first volume of the first edition was
published on 1
February 1884 under the title A New
English Dictionary on Historical Principles; Founded Mainly on the Materials
Collected by The Philological Society.
There's three of them. That makes it plural. (Geddit?)
Styles for this vary. The Auckland Star subbery was ruled by a style Nazi who insisted on "the Beatles is" which just offends the ear. Weirdly, he was a musician so you'd think he'd have been able to hear that it sounds wrong. These days I think most editors would go for "the Beatles are" and "here are the Bee Gees" because we have all relaxed a bit and learned to trust our ears. However, watch this space for David Cohen citing a contrary view from his beloved "NY Times manual of Style and Usage".
2 comments:
Or here IS the Bee Gees... Have never been certain. Would like a definitive answer. Will the new OED oblige?
There's three of them. That makes it plural. (Geddit?)
Styles for this vary. The Auckland Star subbery was ruled by a style Nazi who insisted on "the Beatles is" which just offends the ear. Weirdly, he was a musician so you'd think he'd have been able to hear that it sounds wrong. These days I think most editors would go for "the Beatles are" and "here are the Bee Gees" because we have all relaxed a bit and learned to trust our ears. However, watch this space for David Cohen citing a contrary view from his beloved "NY Times manual of Style and Usage".
Post a Comment